[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
Re: towards turning up bgp...
- To: not-rr@town.hall.org
- Subject: Re: towards turning up bgp...
- From: "John W. Stewart III" <jstewart@mci.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 16:35:09 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jan 1996 14:56:50 EST." <9601101956.AA22685@heineken.engeast>
- Reply-To: not-rr@town.hall.org
- Sender: owner-not-rr@town.hall.org
you're right, of course, bgp gives you many different ways to shoot yourself in the foot ;-)
my point was that if the picture is:
+------------+ +---------+ | world expo |-------------| cyber24 | +------------+ +---------+ | | +----------+ +----------+ | | +-------+ | MCI | +-------+
then assuming no drastic bandwidth differences, shortest AS-path should do what we want
/jws
> > "John W. Stewart III" <jstewart@mci.net> writes > * > * carl, > * > * i'm around to talk. i'm not sure what the cyber24 thing is, > * but i don't think it will be a problem -- if the picture in > * my head is right, then the shortest-AS-path step of the bgp > * decision process should prevent any "silliness" > > hehe, this is the beauty of BGP. There are many ways to route around > the shortest path selection criterium.... We may want to check with > Tony's group to make sure all goes the way it is supposed to go. > > -Marten
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]