August 30, 1996 Chairman Reed E. Hundt Federal Communications Commission 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 0101 Washington, DC 20554 Dear Chairman Hundt: The U. S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) is pleased to be working with the Federal Communications Commission to implement the provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 pertaining to accessibility for persons with disabilities. As you know, section 255(e) of the Act directs the Access Board to develop accessibility guidelines for customer premises equipment and telecommunications equipment by August 1997. The Commission, of course, has the authority to regulate telecommunications services. As technology becomes more sophisticated, and it becomes increasingly difficult to differentiate functions of services from equipment, it is important that our efforts be closely coordinated. We are, therefore, very supportive of any actions by the Commission to assist the Board in its efforts. When the Access Board originally began to explore options for completing its work, it considered issuing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) to obtain information from the public on access issues involving customer premises equipment and telecommunications equipment. The Board also believes in the use of Federal Advisory Committees to bring affected parties together to develop recommendations for proposed regulations. Since the Board must complete its work by August 1997, it was not feasible to convene an advisory committee and issue an ANPRM. The Board was pleased with the suggestion by Commission staff that it would develop a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on telecommunications services and ask a series of questions on access issues involving customer premises equipment and telecommunications equipment and that the resultant material would be shared with our advisory committee. Board and Commission staff members have been coordinating efforts to achieve this mutually beneficial result. Commission staff members attend the Board's advisory committee meetings and their ability to provide information on Commission activities has been invaluable to the committee. The statutory deadline imposed on the Board's efforts has severely constrained the time allotted for our committee to meet. Therefore, it is critical that the comments anticipated from the Commission's NPRM be available to the committee as soon as possible. We understand that the Commission is to decide on the NPRM at its next meeting. We urge you to proceed with the publication of that notice as soon as practicable. The Access Board, the telecommunications industry and the disability community will be positively served by that action. Sincerely, Lawrence W. Roffee Roberta E. Breden Executive Director Chair Access Board Telecommunications Access Advisory Committee