Jamie Klund, MS, OTR
Sun Prairie Public Schools
509 Commercial Avenue
Sun Prairie, WI 53590
(608) 837-2541 (Ext. 2157)
email: jkotr@aol.com
Mark Novak, BSEE, PE
Trace R&D Center
1500 Highland Avenue
Madison, WI 53705-2280
(608) 262-6966
email: menovak@facstaff.wisc.edu
Within the multitude of research and clinical studies that exist in this area, there are several rate enhancement techniques available to the AAC/AT user. Some of the more common strategies include abbreviation expansion, word prediction, and semantic encoding. This paper/presentation will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of word prediction. Also attached to this paper are feature comparison charts of six word prediction programs and a comprehensive listing of word prediction software developers in appendix A and B respectively.
Initially, word prediction provided the physically disabled user a simple word selection list for completing their typed or communication selections. This word list offered rate enhancement by decreasing the number of keystrokes required to type any given word, which became known as keystroke savings. Several studies cited in the literature support the use of word prediction to enhance keystroke savings with experimentally determined keystroke savings' ranges of 37-47% and clinical data to support 23-58% keystroke savings.5,10
There are, however, increased cognitive and perceptual loads that accompany the use of word prediction. The most commonly cited activities increasing cognitive and perceptual loads include visually searching the list of words and deciding whether or not the list contains the desired word.10 Other activities that increase perceptual loads include changing the point of gaze between the keyboard and the display6 as well as the cognitive processing that is needed to use and guide the overall activity.7 There are several studies in the literature which demonstrate that even though there is a keystroke savings with the use of word prediction, there is not always an improvement in overall text generation or communication rate due to the costs of increased cognitive and perceptual loads.7,10
Some factors can either increase or decrease the cognitive and perceptual loads associated with word prediction. The continued use or practice of using word prediction over time may actually improve performance and facilitate more consistent and efficient strategies for using the word list. Studies that have documented the increased cognitive and perceptual loads of word prediction gave the participants only one training session before data collection began. Interestingly, user performance was still improving at the end of the studies.9,10 The strategy used to search the word list also has an effect on the text generation rate. A good "all purpose" strategy is to type one letter and then search the word list. However, depending upon the speed of keypress time and list search time, there may be a more efficient strategy.11
There may also be a reduced fatigue factor with the use of word prediction. Due to keystroke savings, the physically disabled user may be able to work longer with more comfort when using word prediction as compared to letters only typing.
Sometimes characteristics of a word prediction system may influence the cognitive and perceptual loads. These characteristics include the length, orientation, placement, and order of the word list. Studies have shown that speed of text generation rate plateaus at a word list length of about five words.12,15 A vertical word list may be easier to visually scan than a horizontal word list,15 as well as easier to cognitively process, depending upon word order. Words lists can be ordered alphabetically, by word length or statistically.
Another important characteristic of the word prediction system is the lexicon. The lexicon, or dictionary of stored vocabulary, effects whether the desired word will appear in the word list. A relatively small dictionary containing the highest frequency words in the English language will be effective, based on normal word usage.1,16 A dictionary can be fixed, having a stored vocabulary that never changes. This fixed list may be more predictable to the user and become more automatic over time.3 An adaptive dictionary is able to collect new words as the user types and may be more apt to generate the desired word sooner since it is capable of learning the user's typing or communication style. Words can also be added to topic dictionaries of a particular subject matter, forcing these specific content area words to appear in the word list.
Other characteristics of a word prediction system which can improve overall keystroke savings may include automatic spacing and automatic capitalization as well as abbreviation expansion.15
In more recent literature, other benefits of word prediction have been explored, showing that use of word prediction can improve the quality and quantity of written work.4 Word prediction may also enhance the development of written literacy skills5 and provide spelling assistance to those with various levels of spelling disorder. The user can often recognize and select a word from a list that he/she would otherwise have been unable to spell, increasing their independence in producing written work.14 Likewise, the use of grammatical word prediction has been shown to improve sentence structure and the grammatical accuracy of text: Specifically, grammatical word prediction offers assistance in remembering not to omit common function words and using the correct form of words as appropriate.13 Other benefits mentioned in the recent literature include increased user attention span, improved confidence, improved ability to write independently, and increased stimulation of language and vocabulary development.4,8,14,17
In summary, the effect of word prediction may be unique to each individual user. The ability to improve effective communication and typing rate is dependent on the characteristics of the user, the costs versus benefits of using word prediction, and the characteristics of the word prediction system itself. These are all important factors to consider when determining if word prediction is appropriate, rather than thinking about word prediction as a rate enhancement tool alone.
FEATURES4 | KeyREP | Keycache | Aurora |
Platform | PC | PC | PC |
- DOS/Windows | No/Yes | Yes/Yes | Yes/Yes |
Self-contained word proc. | No | No | No |
Dictionary | |||
- Number of words | 5K | with reg. | 100K |
- Add words and phrases | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Choice of dictionaries | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Save/load per. dict. | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Delete/modify dict. | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Auto-learn | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Abbreviation expansion | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Allows for Macros | No | Yes | No |
- Dictionary extension | *.prd | *.dic | *.dct |
Display Window | |||
- Change size/type | Yes | No | Yes |
- Change font | Yes | No | Yes |
- Adjust size of window | Yes | No (auto) | Yes |
- Adjust location | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Fixed or Dynamic | both | both | fixed |
Word Choice Arrangement | |||
- Number of words | 1-10 | 0-9, jump | 1-9,plus |
- Orientation | Hor/ Ver. | Ver. | Hor/Ver |
- Alphabetical order | No (freq.) | Yes | Yes |
- Error Correction Key | Yes | No | Yes |
Prediction | |||
- Predicts ahead - next | No | Yes | Yes |
- Predicts phrases | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Predicts by grammar | No | No | Yes |
Preferences | |||
- Cap. first word in | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Space after word | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Space after period | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Choose by number | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Choose by point/click | No | Yes | No |
- To type selection | type #, | <esc> type #, | type 0 |
- On-Screen Keyboard | No | No | No |
Speech | |||
- Speak letter/word | No | No | Yes |
- Speak word choices | No | No | Yes |
- Speak finished sentence | No | No | Yes |
Price (~Aug. 1, 95, DOS/Win) | $290 | $75/$100 | (var./$430) |
Macintosh Focus
FEATURES4 | TELEPATHIC 2.0 | CO:WRITER | WORDWRITER |
Platform | Mac | Mac | Mac |
Self-contained word proc. | No | No | No |
Dictionary | |||
- Number of words | 0-16,000 | 2, 10 40K | 4000 |
- Add words and phrases | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Choice of dictionaries | Yes | Yes | No |
- Save/load per. dict | Yes | Yes | No |
- Delete/modify dict | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Auto-learn | Yes | Yes | No |
- Abbreviation expansion | Yes | Yes | No |
Display Window | |||
- Change size/type | Yes | Yes | No |
- Change font | Yes | Yes | No |
- Adjust size of window | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Adjust location | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Word Choice Arrangement | |||
- Number of words | 1-64 | 0-9 | Page |
- Fixed or Dynamic | Fixed | Either | Fixed |
Arrangement | |||
- Orientation | Hor/Ver. | Hor/Ver. | Page |
- Alphabetical order | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Error Correction Key | Yes | Yes | No |
Prediction | |||
- Predicts ahead | Yes | Yes | No |
- Predicts phrases | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Predicts by grammar | No | Yes | No |
Preferences | |||
- Cap. first word in | Yes | Yes | No |
- Space after word | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- Space after period | Yes | Yes | No |
- Choose by number | Yes | Yes | No |
- To type selection | Set hot key | esc. key | N/A |
- Choose by point/click | Yes | Yes | Yes |
- On-Screen Keyboard | Yes | No | Yes |
Speech | |||
- Speak letter/word | Yes | Yes | No |
- Speak word choices | Yes | Yes | No |
- Speak finished sentence | No | Yes | No |
Price | $295 | $290 | $150 |
Access Technology
1435 N. Meridian
Indianapolis, IN 46202
(317) 686-6093
FAX (317) 686-6094
Aurora Systems, Inc.
2647 Kingsway
Vancouver, BC V5R
5H4 CANADA
(604) 436-2694
(800) 361-8255
FAX (604) 436-2695
aurora@cyberstore.ca
Cape Software
P.O. Box 800
Harwich, MA 02645
(508) 432-2435
Consultants for Communication Technology
508 Bellevue Terrace
Pittsburgh, PA 15202
(412) 761-6062
FAX (412) 761-7336
Don Johnston Incorporated
P.O. Box 639
1000 N. Rand Rd.
Bldg. 115
Wauconda, IL 60084
(800) 999-4660
(708) 526-2682
FAX (708) 526-4177
djde@aol.com
Gus Communications, Inc.
P.O. Box 4362
Blaine, WA 98231
(604) 279-0110
FAX (604) 279-8474
gharris@guscom.com
http://www.direct.ca/gus/index.html
Institute on Applied Technology
Children's Hospital
Communication Enhancement Center
Fegan Plaza
300 Longwood Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
(617) 355-6998
Kepler Electronic Publishing, Inc.
1525 Centennial Drive
Kingston, ON K7L
4V2 CANADA
(613) 384-1386
FAX (613) 384-3208
kepler@fox.nstn.ca
http://www.novatech.on.ca/kepler/page1.html
Madenta Communications, Inc.
9411A - 20 Avenue
Edmonton, AB T6N
1E5 CANADA
(403) 450-8926
(800) 661-8406
FAX (403) 988-6182
Microsystems Software Inc.
600 Worcester Road
Framingham, MA 01701
(800) 828-2600
(508) 879-9000
BBS (508) 875-8009
FAX (508) 626-8515
NanoPac, Inc.
4833 South Sheridan Road
Suite 402
Tulsa, OK 74145-5718
(918) 665-0329
FAX (918) 665-0361
70524.3306@compuserve.com; dsjb79a@prodigy.com
Olduvai Corp.
9200 s. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 725
Miami, FL 33156
1-800-548-5151
(305) 670-1112
d-283@applelink.apple.com
OMS Development
610-B Forest Avenue
Wilmette, IL 60091
(708) 251-5787
(800) 831-0272
FAX (708) 251-5793
ebholman@netcom.com
Prentke Romich Company
1022 Heyl Road
Wooster, OH 44691
(800) 262-1933
OH (216) 262-1984
Words+, Inc.
40015 Sierra Highway
Bldg. B-145
Palmdale, CA 93550
(805) 266-8500
World Communications
245 Tonopah Drive
Fremont, CA 94539
(510) 656-0911