[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]
Re: What is IMS trying to achieve?
- To: Carl Malamud <carl@radio.com>
- Subject: Re: What is IMS trying to achieve?
- From: Graeme Wood <jaw@ucs.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 14:55:16 +0000 (GMT)
- cc: George Michaelson <G.Michaelson@cc.uq.oz.au>, mbone@isi.edu
- In-Reply-To: <199501101429.JAA11420@trystero.radio.com>
- Reply-To: Graeme.Wood@ucs.ed.ac.uk
On Tue, 10 Jan 1995, Carl Malamud wrote:
> We're perfectly willing to scale all the way back to Alternet or U.S.
> if that is the consensus. So far, you're the first to weigh in on either
> side and I'd welcome additional comments.
I think George's point was that he could not see the relevance of this to a world-wide audience. After all if every MBONE connected country in the world started sending the sessions from their upper and lower houses of government the MBONE would be swamped, even at 16kpbs per channel. Perhaps it would be better if your restricted your ttl to stay within the US except on those occasions when something of global interest is being discussed. Also the IMS:RT-FM channel seems to fly in the face of the agreed policy of restricting "music radio" channels to Radio Free Vat.
Graeme
Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is IMS trying to achieve?
- From: Carl Malamud <carl@radio.com>
- Re: What is IMS trying to achieve?
- From: Carl Malamud <carl@radio.com>
[Date Prev]
[Date Next]
[Thread Prev]
[Thread Next]